Both "fixable" in that you can "improve them" but not quite "remove them entirely". My primary reasons for switching from VLC were not due to efficiency - but due to shadow being washed out and the NVidia color issues. My 'expertise' in media player selection is based on getting the absolute best quality playback for my anime. Maybe that's changed in more recent versions, but I no longer have my older rig to do comparison tests.Īlso what gcb0 said is true as well - but not everyone needs subtitles for their videos. It is typically more noticeable on older hardware, on my current rig I probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference. This let's you navigate through Alfred without leaving the keyboard row(Takes some getting used to atm).į+O = Show folders only in Alfred via Filefilterį+J = Typinator Quick Search.They should run the same in theory - but they don't in practice. I myself am currently toying with the whole simultaneous key trigger thing from karabiner pointed out by at the moment im fiddeling with these settings: Going forward, how about you try to frame your questions in terms of X, not Y, and I'll try to not be a nob? I'm sorry for my part in getting the thread hidden. The nature of the thread violated the "why" of the forum, and my getting stroppy at going in circles violated the "how". It was framed in terms of Y ("Why isn't Alfred more like Launchbar?") instead of X ("How do I do XYZ in Alfred?"). That thread was another example of the XY problem. The purpose of the forum isn't to be a platform for debates, no matter how interesting: it's is to help Alfred users have a better Alfred experience, and hopefully, to be a friendly and welcoming place for Alfred users. comment that I reposted above was a clear stand-out in terms of adding something new (which is why I reposted it).
There really wasn't much new or worthwhile (in the sense of "worth preserving for posterity") in there. It was largely a rehash of previous threads on the same topic, and yeah, it was kinda going in circles. Why not honor everyone who put time and labor into the forum, restore it, and let readers decide what they think? Perhaps edit out the posts that merely characterize what other people have written rather than responding to content with content. When points are being debated back and forth, that is neither unnecessarily negative nor repetitive. The topic was to compare user experiences of Alfred and LaunchBar, and it stayed on topic quite well. It was honestly critical and honestly praiseworthy as appropriate. On the contrary, it was a productive and intelligent discussion among thoughtful, experienced users who are also paying customers. Hope this clarifies why this thread was removed, and we can put this matter to rest. By all means, do ask for help with things that you'd like to do, but please don't use the forum as a soapbox as these posts will be moderated.” It is not a place to vent if you feel Alfred isn't the butler for you. “The forum is a place for helpful questions & answers and improving your knowledge of Alfred.
I have a copy of the thread in the logs, so you need any more specific information from that thread, let me know and I’ll be able to recover this for you. We allowed the discussion to come to its natural conclusion, and left it for long enough for all parties involved to read it, then removed it. It’s extremely rare for a thread to be removed from the forum, but the thread you’re referring to was a particular case where the discussion was unnecessarily negative, repeating the same statements ad nauseum, and veering off-topic.
0 kommentar(er)
